Date: Wed, 1 Jul 1998 11:26:25 +0200
From: Damien Doligez <Damien.Doligez@inria.fr>
Subject: Re: Garbage collection qustion
>From: Ohad Rodeh <firstname.lastname@example.org>
>[allocation: minor=0.0M (4% promoted) (direct major=0K)|collections:
>minor=1, major=0, compact=0|words: 63488 (0% live) (1 chunks)|blocks: 120
>(99% live) (largest_free=62878)]
>[allocation: minor=2.7M (0% promoted) (direct major=0K)|collections:
>minor=91, major=21, compact=3|words: 63488 (1% live) (1 chunks)|blocks:
>255 (99% live) (largest_free=62343)]
I think you are misinterpreting the numbers. The relevant variable
here is heap_words, which doesn't increase at all.
Does the size of your process (as reported by ps) actually increase ?
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Jan 02 2000 - 11:58:14 MET