[Bug/Feature]: (#meth) syntax is gone ?

From: boos@arthur.u-strasbg.fr
Date: Sat Aug 22 1998 - 12:38:43 MET DST

Next message: Daniel de Rauglaudre: "camlp4 2.00-- intermediate version without objects and classes"
Previous message: Mitchell, Brian, VBAVACO: "Encapsulation in Objective Caml"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

From: boos@arthur.u-strasbg.fr
Date: Sat, 22 Aug 1998 12:38:43 +0200
Message-Id: <199808221038.MAA01693@arthur.u-strasbg.fr>
To: caml-list@inria.fr
Subject: [Bug/Feature]: (#meth) syntax is gone ?

Hello,

I realize that this feature was never
documented in the reference manual (at least not in version 1.07).
But it was quite usefull for me, the main usage for it being :

List.iter (#meth) [ obj1; obj2; obj3 ]

instead of the following :

List.iter (fun o -> o#meth) [ obj1; obj2; obj3 ]

Will this be avaible again in the future,
or should I start fixing my sources (or patching parser.mly :) ?

-- Christian

Next message: Daniel de Rauglaudre: "camlp4 2.00-- intermediate version without objects and classes"
Previous message: Mitchell, Brian, VBAVACO: "Encapsulation in Objective Caml"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Jan 02 2000 - 11:58:15 MET