To: caml-list@inria.fr
Subject: Re: Functional composition operator?
Date: Tue, 08 Dec 1998 21:52:54 +0000
From: John Harrison <John.Harrison@cl.cam.ac.uk>
Message-Id: <E0znV41-00070g-00@heaton.cl.cam.ac.uk>
Pierre Weis writes:
| In fact we discourage the usage of functional composition as a general
| programming tool
A very bad idea, in my opinion.
| -- it only save a few characters in programs
| (Compare
| let h = f o g
| with
| let h x = f (g x);;)
| -- it breaks the polymorphism
| (if defined as
| let h = f o g
| h is not generalized, since its definition is a function
| application, whereas inline expansion of functional composition
| let h x = f (g x)
| being the definition of a function is properly generalized.)
These alternatives are not semantically equivalent. If f and g are
complicated expressions that can be further evaluated, it is often
highly undesirable to perform the evaluation every time h is called,
which is what "let h x = f(g x)" entails.
John.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Jan 02 2000 - 11:58:17 MET