Date: Wed, 9 Dec 1998 19:17:23 +0300 (MSK)
From: Anton Moscal <email@example.com>
To: Andrew Kay <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Subject: RE: Functional composition operator?
On Tue, 8 Dec 1998, Andrew Kay wrote:
> From: John Whitley <email@example.com>
> > is there a consensus for choice of infix composition operator?
> In the end we settled on >> and << for forward and reverse
> composition respectively, satisfying the equations:
> (f << g) x = f (g x) = (g >> f) x
In camlp4 << and >> are used as quotes for invocation of quotation
expander. Your proposals will interfere with camlp4. I propose <<<
and >>> (this also leads to problem with camlp4, but this issue can be
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Jan 02 2000 - 11:58:17 MET