Re: Constructed types

From: Toby Moth (tm1@cise.npl.co.uk)
Date: Thu Jan 21 1999 - 16:37:19 MET

Next message: Simon Helsen: "Re: monomorphism is ... ?"
Previous message: Pierre Weis: "Re: monomorphism is ... ?"
Maybe in reply to: Chris Keane: "Constructed types"
Next in thread: Markus Mottl: "Re: Constructed types"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Date: Thu, 21 Jan 1999 15:37:19 GMT
From: Toby Moth <tm1@cise.npl.co.uk>
Message-Id: <199901211537.PAA06762@squall.cise.npl.co.uk>
To: caml-list@inria.fr, Chris.Keane@comlab.ox.ac.uk
Subject: Re: Constructed types

I remembered this coming up before but have only just found the reference. The question of constructors was raised by Simon Clematide - 20 Jan 97 and answered by Xavier Leroy. Check out the archives for details.

Toby

Next message: Simon Helsen: "Re: monomorphism is ... ?"
Previous message: Pierre Weis: "Re: monomorphism is ... ?"
Maybe in reply to: Chris Keane: "Constructed types"
Next in thread: Markus Mottl: "Re: Constructed types"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Jan 02 2000 - 11:58:18 MET