Message-Id: <3.0.5.32.19990422102052.01b6a8e0@mailhost.ed.harlequin.co.uk>
Date: Thu, 22 Apr 1999 10:20:52 +0100
To: luther@dpt-info.u-strasbg.fr, Dave Berry <daveb@harlequin.co.uk>,
From: Dave Berry <daveb@harlequin.co.uk>
Subject: Re: licence issues
In-Reply-To: <19990422084300.B18434@maxime.u-strasbg.fr>
At 08:43 22/04/99 +0200, Sven LUTHER wrote:
>> I find the most useful definition is not "free software", but "Open Source
>> software". This has a broader definition than just GNU. If you look at
>
>which is just the debian free software guidelines (DFSG) from where it
>originated, look also at :
>
>(Another case where proper credit is not always given to the right persons
...)
This is getting off-topic, but in this case it looks like credit has been
given. Check the Change History and notice at the bottom of the Open
Source Definition.
Dave.
Languages Group Manager.
Harlequin Ltd., Lismore House, 127 George St, Edinburgh, EH2 4JN, UK.
Tel: +44 131 240 6106.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Jan 02 2000 - 11:58:22 MET