Hi,
I'm not sure QT would be so nice to use, since the first problem would
consist of writing the bindings for caml (unless I'm mistaken and they
already exist). I think the best target is definitely gtk, since it
runs under linux and win32, a port on BeOS is in the works, and it is
fairly widely used.
Alan Schmitt
>Benjamin C. Pierce writes:
> > We in the Unison group are also about to embark on a major UI redesign
> > and have been wondering which toolkit to use. Besides Thorsten's
> > points, there are two more that are critical concerns for us:
> >
> > * seamless portability (Unix and Win32)
> > * ability to build statically linked binaries (this is a pretty
> > big drawback to the Tk-based solutions)
> >
> > Comments on these points as well as the others would be very useful.
>
>There's always QT. It's nice to work with (at least in C++), very
>widely used and comprehensive (because of KDE), and was written from
>the start to be cross-platform (X & Win). NB it is uncontroversially
>free these days.
-- The hacker: someone who figured things out and made something cool happen.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Feb 23 2000 - 18:55:06 MET