RE: Interpreter vs hardware threads

From: Edwin Young (edyoung@microsoft.com)
Date: Fri Mar 03 2000 - 10:10:05 MET

  • Next message: Christophe Raffalli: "Re: GC + thread"

    From: William Chesters [mailto:williamc@paneris.org]
    > Judging by Max's .sig he's doing embedded telecoms boxes,
    > something like a GSM HLR which juggles many thousands of concurrent
    > transactions in some ghastly protocol or other.

    If that's the case, perhaps he should investigate Erlang. Since it was
    designed by Ericsson specifically for embedded telephony apps, it would seem
    an ideal fit. It does indeed support thousands of concurrent threads
    (internal to the interpreter rather than OS-based).

    Regards,

    --
    Edwin Young
    



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Mar 06 2000 - 14:14:29 MET generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Mar 06 2000 - 14:14:29 MET