> And why not "as", i.e. "t as x", as I explained once in a previous post.
> I never did get an explanation as to why this wasn't an better solution. It
> reuses a rarely-used keyword in a perfectly backward-compatible way.
This is not backward-compatible since ident1 as ident2 is a special
case of pattern as ident. Hence ident1 as ident2 already has a
meaning in Caml: it means that you want to write ident2 as an alias
for ident1.
Best regards,
-- Pierre WeisINRIA, Projet Cristal, http://pauillac.inria.fr/~weis
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Mar 14 2000 - 19:24:15 MET