Re: When functional languages can be accepted by industry?

From: Francois Pottier (Francois.Pottier@inria.fr)
Date: Tue Apr 18 2000 - 07:54:09 MET DST

Next message: Brian Rogoff: "Re: When functional languages can be accepted by industry?"

Previous message: bdb-as-camluser@netcourrier.com: "Re: When functional languages can be accepted by industry?"
In reply to: Xavier Leroy: "Re: When functional languages can be accepted by industry?"
Reply: Vitaly Lugovsky: "Re: When functional languages can be accepted by industry?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Mon, Apr 17, 2000 at 05:35:47PM +0200, Xavier Leroy wrote:
> This is true, a "camldoc" tool would be nice.

May I advocate Jean-Christophe Filliâtre's excellent literate
programming tool, ocamlweb?

It nicely turns your O'Caml source code into a TeX document,
including an identifier index. Comments are expected to contain
TeX source.

-- 
François Pottier
Francois.Pottier@inria.fr
http://pauillac.inria.fr/~fpottier/

Next message: Brian Rogoff: "Re: When functional languages can be accepted by industry?"
Previous message: bdb-as-camluser@netcourrier.com: "Re: When functional languages can be accepted by industry?"
In reply to: Xavier Leroy: "Re: When functional languages can be accepted by industry?"
Reply: Vitaly Lugovsky: "Re: When functional languages can be accepted by industry?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Apr 19 2000 - 15:09:20 MET DST