Re: When functional languages can be accepted by industry?

From: Max Skaller (maxs@in.ot.com.au)
Date: Thu Apr 20 2000 - 03:44:07 MET DST

Next message: Christophe Raffalli: "Re: Caml wish list"

Previous message: Michael Hicks: "Re: When functional languages can be accepted by industry?"
In reply to: Vitaly Lugovsky: "Re: When functional languages can be accepted by industry?"
Reply: Vitaly Lugovsky: "Re: When functional languages can be accepted by industry?"
Reply: Jacques Garrigue: "Re: When functional languages can be accepted by industry?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Vitaly Lugovsky wrote:
>
> P.S. Maybe, all that we need, is a RAD tool for ocaml? It can
> look like a better module finder ("module name" -> "file name" is not
> a good idea. Paths in Java is much better), and a lot of reusable
> modules for common tasks (database, GUI)...

There already is one: the lablbrowser. It's quite
good functionally -- but the interface sucks.

-- 
John (Max) Skaller at OTT [Open Telecommications Ltd]
mailto:maxs@in.ot.com.au      -- at work
mailto:skaller@maxtal.com.au  -- at home

Next message: Christophe Raffalli: "Re: Caml wish list"
Previous message: Michael Hicks: "Re: When functional languages can be accepted by industry?"
In reply to: Vitaly Lugovsky: "Re: When functional languages can be accepted by industry?"
Reply: Vitaly Lugovsky: "Re: When functional languages can be accepted by industry?"
Reply: Jacques Garrigue: "Re: When functional languages can be accepted by industry?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Apr 20 2000 - 09:55:59 MET DST