Re: Alternative generic hash function

From: Damien Doligez (Damien.Doligez@inria.fr)
Date: Mon May 29 2000 - 17:00:29 MET DST

Next message: Francois Pottier: "Re: Alternative generic hash function"

Previous message: Sven LUTHER: "Re: ocamlc command line suggested features"
Maybe in reply to: STARYNKEVITCH Basile: "Alternative generic hash function"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

>From: Dan Grossman <danieljg@cs.cornell.edu>

>[Veuillez me pardonner; je ne donne pas une traduction en français parce

No need to apologize, really.

>* Recording this information would only require 1 header bit. (I
>personally could live with 21 size bits.) Getting this bit into the
>header word should not be hard.

Some people are already complaining about the maximum size of arrays.
And it's true that 16 megabytes is quite small.

-- Damien

Next message: Francois Pottier: "Re: Alternative generic hash function"
Previous message: Sven LUTHER: "Re: ocamlc command line suggested features"
Maybe in reply to: STARYNKEVITCH Basile: "Alternative generic hash function"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon May 29 2000 - 22:52:39 MET DST