Re: pb with ocamldep

From: Michael Hicks (mwh@dsl.cis.upenn.edu)
Date: Wed Jun 07 2000 - 20:48:28 MET DST

Next message: Markus Mottl: "Re: Reverse-Engineering Bytecode: A Possible Commercial Objection To O'Caml"

Previous message: Max Skaller: "Re: pb with ocamldep"
In reply to: Christophe Raffalli: "pb with ocamldep"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

> It would be nice ocamldep coud also accept the -pp option to call a
> preprocessor.
>
> I have some problems with files that are not syntacticaly correct before
> preprocessing !
> So I can not use ocamldep on these files and this is annoying.

I had the same problem with our active networking software, in which we use
the camlp4 ifdef syntax. Therefore, to do dependency generation, we use
camlp4 with pr_depend (provided with the distribution), e.g.:

camlp4 pa_ifdef.cmo pr_depend.cmo -- $(INCLUDES) $(IFDEF_FLAGS) file1 file2
...

If you aren't using camlp4 for your preprocessor, then your suggestion above
would be more appropriate.

Mike

-- 
Michael Hicks
Ph.D. Candidate, the University of Pennsylvania
http://www.cis.upenn.edu/~mwh            mailto://mwh@dsl.cis.upenn.edu
"In essential things, unity; in doubtful things, liberty; in all things, 
 charity."

Next message: Markus Mottl: "Re: Reverse-Engineering Bytecode: A Possible Commercial Objection To O'Caml"
Previous message: Max Skaller: "Re: pb with ocamldep"
In reply to: Christophe Raffalli: "pb with ocamldep"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Jun 08 2000 - 22:31:58 MET DST