Re: Reverse-Engineering Bytecode: A Possible Commercial Objection To O'Caml

From: Max Skaller (maxs@in.ot.com.au)
Date: Thu Jun 08 2000 - 00:02:32 MET DST

  • Next message: Sven LUTHER: "Re: Reverse-Engineering Bytecode: A Possible Commercial Objection To O'Caml"

    Daniel Ortmann wrote:
    >
    > Sirs,
    >
    > With the intent of furthering the practical commercial use of O'Caml, or at
    > least eliminating some possible objections to its use ... I submit the
    > following observations and questions for your consideration:

    The issues raised so far (where I work and use Ocaml) were:

            1) no one here knows it
            2) possible licence restrictions

    Since I use the native code compiler exclusively,
    there's no current problem involving bytecode.

    BTW: people here read books. An English Ocaml book would provide
    very strong support for industrial use. 

    -- 
John (Max) Skaller at OTT [Open Telecommications Ltd]
mailto:maxs@in.ot.com.au      -- at work
mailto:skaller@maxtal.com.au  -- at home

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Jun 08 2000 - 22:33:05 MET DST