Re: Camlidl copyright.

From: Xavier Leroy (Xavier.Leroy@inria.fr)
Date: Tue Feb 22 2000 - 20:51:52 MET

  • Next message: Max Skaller: "Re: Portability of applications written in OCAML: C stuff"

    > I had a simple question about Camlidl. I notice that there has not
    > been a release since the change to the LGPL and the other license.
    > The LICENSE file in Camlidl gives rights to distribute the files
    > generated by Camlidl, but no mention is given to the runtime library
    > files required.
    > What is the intended distribution terms of these files?

    The same terms as those of the OCaml system, e.g. Q for the compiler
    and LGPL for the runtime library. The next release of CamlIDL (if I
    can find time to work on it!) will be made under those new terms.

    - Xavier Leroy



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Feb 23 2000 - 18:53:32 MET