Date: Sat, 23 Jan 1999 11:57:28 +0100 (MET)
From: David Monniaux <firstname.lastname@example.org>
To: Liste CAML <email@example.com>
Subject: Re: Array interface question
On Fri, 22 Jan 1999, Pierre Weis wrote:
> > Why is there no creation function which does not take a default
> > value for filling the array?
Perhaps the solution is to have an improved implementation of the 'a
option type, where a NULL pointer would mean "None" and anything else
would be the element of type 'a.
Is there anything wrong with this approach? [except that it could break
some interfaced C code that relies on NULL pointers in "private" types..]
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Jan 02 2000 - 11:58:18 MET