Option types and O'Labl merger

From: William Chesters (williamc@dai.ed.ac.uk)
Date: Tue Oct 12 1999 - 16:38:33 MET DST

Date: Tue, 12 Oct 1999 15:38:33 +0100
Message-Id: <220.199910121438@insch>
From: William Chesters <williamc@dai.ed.ac.uk>
To: caml-list@inria.fr
Subject: Option types and O'Labl merger
In-Reply-To: <19991012103445R.Jacques.Garrigue@inria.fr>

Jacques Garrigue writes:
> By the way, and this also an answer to another mail I saw recently,
> O'Caml and O'Labl are going to merge soon.

hey hey :-)

> If you really think that having such costless options would be useful,
> it is the time to make pressure to have them included in the merger.

"Could we have costless options please, if it's REALLY not going to
complicate the compiler too much?"

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Jan 02 2000 - 11:58:27 MET