From: "Frank A. Christoph" <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Subject: RE: Option types and O'Labl merger
Date: Wed, 13 Oct 1999 14:35:44 +0900
> > If you really think that having such costless options would be useful,
> > it is the time to make pressure to have them included in the merger.
> "Could we have costless options please, if it's REALLY not going to
> complicate the compiler too much?"
I don't really have an opinion on "costless options", but it is worth noting
that including them is going to change the runtime's data representation,
undoubtedly breaking many people's C-interfacing code (unless they use
CamlIDL, I guess).
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Jan 02 2000 - 11:58:27 MET