Re: When functional languages can be accepted by industry?

From: Remi VANICAT (remi.vanicat@labri.u-bordeaux.fr)
Date: Tue Apr 25 2000 - 12:50:01 MET DST

Next message: Remi VANICAT: "Re: Ocaml and (the lack of) RAD tools"

Previous message: Julian Assange: "Re: Objective Caml 3.00 released"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Jacques Garrigue <garrigue@kurims.kyoto-u.ac.jp> writes:

> * editor functionality is reduced to a minimum, because real
> programmers use emacs anyway.

a nice amelioration of ocamlbrowser may be the use of an external
editor, (and, as emacs offer, with emacsclient or gnudoit a way to be
use by an external program, it would be very useful...)

-- 
Rémi Vanicat
vanicat@labri.u-bordeaux.fr
http://dept-info.labri.u-bordeaux.fr/~vanicat

Next message: Remi VANICAT: "Re: Ocaml and (the lack of) RAD tools"
Previous message: Julian Assange: "Re: Objective Caml 3.00 released"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Apr 28 2000 - 11:52:36 MET DST