Re: Ocaml and (the lack of) RAD tools

From: Remi VANICAT (remi.vanicat@labri.u-bordeaux.fr)
Date: Thu Apr 27 2000 - 20:10:00 MET DST

Next message: Jacques Garrigue: "Re: LablTk in Objective Caml 3.00"

Previous message: Remi VANICAT: "Re: When functional languages can be accepted by industry?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

"Georges Mariano" <georges.mariano@inrets.fr> writes:

> Hello every one,

[snip a lot of think about an ocaml backend for glade]

I'have already look to this posibility, and i believed it won't be so
difficult. I also know thant at some point in his history lablgtk have
a begginning of such tool, but they have drop it, can it be finded
anywhere?

-- 
Rémi Vanicat
vanicat@labri.u-bordeaux.fr
http://dept-info.labri.u-bordeaux.fr/~vanicat

Next message: Jacques Garrigue: "Re: LablTk in Objective Caml 3.00"
Previous message: Remi VANICAT: "Re: When functional languages can be accepted by industry?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Apr 28 2000 - 11:59:47 MET DST