CamlTk and LablTk

From: Georges MARIANO (georges.mariano@inrets.fr)
Date: Thu May 18 2000 - 19:37:41 MET DST

Next message: Simon Peyton-Jones: "RE: reference initialization"

Previous message: Pierre Weis: "Re: reference initialization"
Reply: Pierre Weis: "Re: CamlTk and LablTk"
Reply: Dave Berry: "RE: CamlTk and LablTk"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Hello everyone,

very short question :

How can we compare camltk and labltk ??
(functionalities, ease of writing (complex) GUI, portability,
integration in Ocaml-3.00, ...)

I know that this question would result in a flame war but I
hope that we can be smart enough to avoid it ;-)
Just help the puzzled user please...

-- 
> Georges MARIANO                 tel: (33) 03 20 43 84 06
> INRETS, 20 rue Elisee Reclus    fax: (33) 03 20 43 83 59
> 59650 Villeneuve d'Ascq         mailto:mariano@terre.inrets.fr
> FRANCE.                         
> http://www3.inrets.fr/Public/ESTAS/Mariano.Georges/
> http://www3.inrets.fr/BUGhome.html         mailto:Bforum@estas1.inrets.fr

Next message: Simon Peyton-Jones: "RE: reference initialization"
Previous message: Pierre Weis: "Re: reference initialization"
Reply: Pierre Weis: "Re: CamlTk and LablTk"
Reply: Dave Berry: "RE: CamlTk and LablTk"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon May 22 2000 - 17:37:46 MET DST