Re: Portability of applications written in OCAML: C stuff

From: Max Skaller (maxs@in.ot.com.au)
Date: Fri Feb 25 2000 - 01:35:13 MET

  • Next message: Alan Schmitt: "Re: Portability of applications written in OCAML: C stuff"

    Gerd Stolpmann wrote:

    > We all know that Windows is not a serious operating system because it lacks
    > support for many tasks we all EXPECT from an operating system.

            ? I do not understand. I run NT at home, and it supports
    a LOT of functionality I expect from an operating system that my
    Linux box does not.

            It runs games and office products like Word and IE.
    It has a clean, snappy, GUI. It has a reasonable scheduler, and a
    superior method of program construction (DLLs). 

    -- 
John (Max) Skaller at OTT [Open Telecommications Ltd]
mailto:maxs@in.ot.com.au      -- at work
mailto:skaller@maxtal.com.au  -- at home

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Feb 25 2000 - 14:18:26 MET